W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Proposal: feHSL element (was Re: [filter-effects] hue-rotate() and saturate() filters)

From: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 05:22:18 +1100
Cc: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, FX <public-fx@w3.org>
Message-id: <78EC76EB-E3C0-4BF1-911F-93B3CD37D3D6@apple.com>
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>

On 19 Oct 2013, at 3:59 am, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote:

> Hello Dirk,
> Friday, October 18, 2013, 6:25:29 PM, you wrote:
>> Hi Dean and Chris,
>> I would like to clarify if you are both on the same side.
>> So you both agree that we should have a new feHSL element?
> Not speaking for Dino but I do, yes.
>> You both agree that his primitive should operate in HSL regardless
>> of the specified value of the 'color-interpolation-filters' property?
> That is my proposal, yes.
>> And you both agree that you do not want to fix hue-rotate() but
>> create a new shorthand function for this new operation?
> I could go either way on that one. I think the shorthand is more
> recent, less widely deployed and there is less risk of breaking content
> that uses it, so it should be safe to redefine it.
> However, I would be persuaded by arguments that there is deployed
> content and that a new shorthand (such as hue-rotate-hsl() for
> example) should be created.

^^ This is what I meant: new feHSL and new shorthand hue-rotate-hsl.

Received on Friday, 18 October 2013 18:22:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:47 UTC