- From: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 05:22:18 +1100
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, FX <public-fx@w3.org>
On 19 Oct 2013, at 3:59 am, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote: > Hello Dirk, > > Friday, October 18, 2013, 6:25:29 PM, you wrote: > >> Hi Dean and Chris, > >> I would like to clarify if you are both on the same side. > >> So you both agree that we should have a new feHSL element? > > Not speaking for Dino but I do, yes. > >> You both agree that his primitive should operate in HSL regardless >> of the specified value of the 'color-interpolation-filters' property? > > That is my proposal, yes. > >> And you both agree that you do not want to fix hue-rotate() but >> create a new shorthand function for this new operation? > > I could go either way on that one. I think the shorthand is more > recent, less widely deployed and there is less risk of breaking content > that uses it, so it should be safe to redefine it. > > However, I would be persuaded by arguments that there is deployed > content and that a new shorthand (such as hue-rotate-hsl() for > example) should be created. ^^ This is what I meant: new feHSL and new shorthand hue-rotate-hsl. Dean
Received on Friday, 18 October 2013 18:22:53 UTC