- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 22:46:03 -0700
- To: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>
- CC: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 05:46:37 UTC
On Oct 16, 2013, at 6:46 AM, "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org<mailto:robert@ocallahan.org>> wrote: Another approach, which is actually what Gecko currently does by accident, is to make SVG's "transform" attribute affect an SVG element's contribution to its parent's bounding box, but make CSS transforms not affect the element's contribution to its parent's bounding box. That is what the SVG spec says currently just because CSS Transforms didn't exist at the time. It doesn't sound very intuitive though. I think we want to encourage people to use style sheets and CSS in general and not to rely on a specific attribute from SVG and cascade (presentation style) from CSS. IIRC WebKit and Blink do include the CSS Transform in the bounding box. But then again, both just have 2D support and strip 3D components out. Greetings Dirk Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 05:46:37 UTC