- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 09:48:47 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
On Aug 26, 2013, at 6:37 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> The specification currently does not say what happens on negative standard deviation values for feGaussianBlur [1]. I suggest that it is not treated differently than a value of zero: the filter primitive does not have any effect on the input image, the input does not get blurred. I'll change the specification text to this suggestion. >>> >>> Greetings, >>> Dirk >>> >>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/filter-effects/#feGaussianBlurElement >> >> I agree with this change. > > Note that I would disagree with this for blur() - a negative value > should be invalid at parse time. We try not to do fixup in CSS, since > we have good fallback mechanisms. Yes, it needs to be rejected at parse time according to the spec. Greetings, Dirk > > ~TJ
Received on Monday, 26 August 2013 16:49:15 UTC