On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > I feel pretty strongly that the SVG behavior is not appropriate. I think any > sort of invalid 'filter' value, including a <filter> element with a child > element of unknown type, should cause the filtered element to be rendered > normally (i.e. 'filter' treated as 'none'). Otherwise I think introducing > new <fe> SVG element types does not get useful fallback. It doesn't get useful fallback in any case. You can't provide a fallback filter. ~TJReceived on Friday, 12 July 2013 21:29:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:46 UTC