- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 08:22:33 -0700
- To: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- CC: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
On Jun 4, 2012, at 4:37 AM, Dr. Olaf Hoffmann wrote: > Dirk Schulze: > ... >> >>> Maybe the word 'keyframe' indicates the second option, not sure, >>> if I understand this correctly, because the draft does not define what >>> a keyframe is (related to SVG/SMIL animations, I think, in the >>> draft about CSS animation this word is defined, but has no formal >>> relation to SVG/SMIL animations - and it would be only confusing >>> to require reading drafts about CSS animation to get >>> SVG/SMIL animation about transform values right - therefore >>> if 15 is intended to be applicable for both types of animation, >>> a few words need to be chosen more carefully to avoid >>> misunderstandings). >> >> There were concerns raised about this wording before. I tried to change the >> wording, so that it is not specific to any kind of animation, but describes >> interpolation between two transform function lists. See [3]. Would be happy >> to get your opinion about the change. >> > > Would be better for avoid 'from' and 'to' at all. > Better variant is maybe more something like this: > > ' > When animating or transitioning transforms, the transform function lists must > be interpolated. For interpolation between two transform functions lists A > and B the rules described below are applied. > > * If both the A and B are ‘none’: I suggested 'source' and 'destination', but your proposal sounds good as well. Greetings, Dirk > > ... > ' > Olaf > > >> [3] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-transforms/#animation > > >
Received on Monday, 4 June 2012 16:51:55 UTC