- From: Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 13:37:32 +0200
- To: public-fx@w3.org
Dirk Schulze: ... > > > Maybe the word 'keyframe' indicates the second option, not sure, > > if I understand this correctly, because the draft does not define what > > a keyframe is (related to SVG/SMIL animations, I think, in the > > draft about CSS animation this word is defined, but has no formal > > relation to SVG/SMIL animations - and it would be only confusing > > to require reading drafts about CSS animation to get > > SVG/SMIL animation about transform values right - therefore > > if 15 is intended to be applicable for both types of animation, > > a few words need to be chosen more carefully to avoid > > misunderstandings). > > There were concerns raised about this wording before. I tried to change the > wording, so that it is not specific to any kind of animation, but describes > interpolation between two transform function lists. See [3]. Would be happy > to get your opinion about the change. > Would be better for avoid 'from' and 'to' at all. Better variant is maybe more something like this: ' When animating or transitioning transforms, the transform function lists must be interpolated. For interpolation between two transform functions lists A and B the rules described below are applied. * If both the A and B are ‘none’: ... ' Olaf > [3] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-transforms/#animation
Received on Monday, 4 June 2012 11:38:08 UTC