- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:50:46 -0800
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: alex@abbra.com, public-fx@w3.org
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote: > On Tuesday, November 22, 2011, 5:10:34 PM, Tab wrote: > TAJ> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 4:13 AM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote: >>> On Tuesday, November 22, 2011, 2:55:50 AM, alex wrote: >>>> What about shape-mode/blend-mode which is another possibility. >>> I like those two names. shape-mode is appropriate,and keeping the name blend-mode is good as it is already understood and named like that in various graphical authoring applications. >> I don't understand 'shape-mode'. This is about alpha, not shapes, right? > > Perhaps I snipped too much of alex's mail (in which he explains how this is about shape, not alpha) when replying. No, I read the email. The only "shape", though, is the theoretical 4-area square, which is only used for explanatory purposes. That's not a "shape" as the word is normally understood, particular in SVG, where "shape" more commonly refers to geometry. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 16:51:43 UTC