On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote: > On Tuesday, November 22, 2011, 5:10:34 PM, Tab wrote: > TAJ> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 4:13 AM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote: >>> On Tuesday, November 22, 2011, 2:55:50 AM, alex wrote: >>>> What about shape-mode/blend-mode which is another possibility. >>> I like those two names. shape-mode is appropriate,and keeping the name blend-mode is good as it is already understood and named like that in various graphical authoring applications. >> I don't understand 'shape-mode'. This is about alpha, not shapes, right? > > Perhaps I snipped too much of alex's mail (in which he explains how this is about shape, not alpha) when replying. No, I read the email. The only "shape", though, is the theoretical 4-area square, which is only used for explanatory purposes. That's not a "shape" as the word is normally understood, particular in SVG, where "shape" more commonly refers to geometry. ~TJReceived on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 16:51:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:39 UTC