Re: [public-fx] <none>

On Tuesday, November 22, 2011, 5:10:34 PM, Tab wrote:

TAJ> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 4:13 AM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote:
>> On Tuesday, November 22, 2011, 2:55:50 AM, alex wrote:

>> aac> What about shape-mode/blend-mode which is another possibility.

>> I like those two names. shape-mode is appropriate,and keeping the name blend-mode is good as it is already understood and named like that in various graphical authoring applications.

TAJ> I don't understand 'shape-mode'.  This is about alpha, not shapes, right?

Perhaps I snipped too much of alex's mail (in which he explains how this is about shape, not alpha) when replying.




-- 
 Chris Lilley   Technical Director, Interaction Domain                 
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
 Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups

Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 16:45:10 UTC