- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:17:31 -0700
- To: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>
- Cc: public-fx@w3.org
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com> wrote: > - Added drop-shadow shorthand Elika and I have been advocating an approach for functions where, when possible, the contents are just normal CSS values. Explicit comma-separated argument lists should only be used when necessary for disambiguation. In particular, this would mean that blur() can probably drop the commas and just accept one or two space-separated lengths, and drop-shadow() can drop the commas and just use <shadow>, perhaps with a restriction that you can't provide the 'input' keyword (text-shadow does this). Gamma and unsharp can potentially drop the commas as well. As a sidenote, while I understand the historic reasoning behind the name of the unsharp() function, it's really super-confusing to have something that sharpens an image be named "unsharp". Could we change this to just "sharpen" or something? ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2011 16:18:26 UTC