W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: Dropping angle-bracket syntax for animation

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 17:09:05 +1200
Message-ID: <4E3A2971.30400@mcc.id.au>
To: Vincent Hardy <vhardy@adobe.com>
CC: Patrick Dengler <patd@microsoft.com>, Brian Birtles <birtles@gmail.com>, David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>, 'www-svg' <www-svg@w3.org> 
On 4/08/11 3:06 AM, Vincent Hardy wrote:
> I also thought we had resolved, during the FX meeting last week, to work
> on requirements first. However, looking at the minutes log, I cannot
> find any RESOLUTION or ACTION recorded on that.
>
> http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/fx/20110726
>
> It seems that the log is truncated at midnight, and I do not see the
> following part at:
>
> http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/fx/20110727

Looking at http://www.w3.org/2011/07/26-fx-irc, the conversation ended 
with Dean taking an action to write up use cases and a list of features 
to be added to CSS Animation.

I suppose if we get agreement on that, then we can see what the 
difference in functionality between SVG and (extended) CSS Animations 
is, which will help us determine which of the three broad directions 
Brian outlined we should head towards.
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2011 05:10:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:38 UTC