Thanks Cameron for your feedback. (2011/08/02 9:50), Cameron McCormack wrote: > I think at this point, we should be mandating CSS support for SVG > viewers anyway. Ok, I wasn't sure if that was on the table for SVG 2 or not. For SVG tools that aren't attempting to do round-trip authoring I think the CSS support requirement would be easier to meet if CSS can be dealt with as a pre-processing step. For example, run the input through a tool like SVG scour[1] and convert CSS syntax to presentational attributes. Unfortunately that won't be possible if there's no XML syntax for animations. Tools will be forced to provide their own workarounds which increases complexity. Brian [1] http://www.codedread.com/scour/Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 21:20:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:38 UTC