On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Brian Birtles <birtles@gmail.com> wrote: > Again, as I mentioned in my previous post, I think we can mandate CSS > support in a way that doesn't raise the barrier to entry too high by > providing an angle-bracket syntax for animations. Right; I don't necessarily have anything against providing a different syntax for the same functionality. CSS parsing isn't very hard, but if it's even easier for many SVG-geared tools to produce or consume a syntax that looks like XML, so be it. ~TJReceived on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 03:02:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:38 UTC