- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 13:29:10 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Simon Fraser <simon.fraser@apple.com>, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, public-fx@w3.org
On May 7, 2010, at 12:43 , Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Simon Fraser <simon.fraser@apple.com> wrote: >> We have aspect-ratio in media queries: >> <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-mediaqueries/#aspect-ratio> >> >> It would be nice if there were some consistency. > > Right, I definitely support allowing a single number defining the > ratio, just as MQ does, precisely for consistency on that front. But > it's not very easy to use - I don't think most authors will > intuitively recognize that 1.77 corresponds to 16:9 - so I'd also like > a two-number version. I'm lost. aspect-ratio is documented in CSS3 as a ratio, which is a two-integer rational number (for an integer, you even have to say /1): The <ratio> value is a positive (not zero or negative) <integer> followed by optional whitespace, followed by a solidus (‘/’), followed by optional whitespace, followed by a positive <integer>. > The question is just if we only need integers, > or if we need numbers for intellectual-compat. > > ~TJ > David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Friday, 7 May 2010 20:29:43 UTC