- From: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:06:56 -0500
- To: Forms WG <public-forms@w3.org>
Regrets for today's call, I am traveling. -Erik On Apr 29, 2009, at 12:05 AM, John Boyer wrote: > > Regrets so far: None > Start Time: 10:45am Eastern US (15:45Z, except 14:45Z during US DST) > Duration: 90 minutes > > Previous minutes: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2009Apr/0010.html > IRC supplement: http://www.w3.org/2009/04/22-forms-minutes.html > > Minute takers rotation list, when not done by Leigh: > Steven, Erik, Nick, MarkB/Paul, Ulrich/Sebastian, Charlie > > Kenneth/MarkS?, Raman?, Susan?, Rafael/Rogelio? > > AGENDA ITEMS: > ============= > * = be ready to discuss > + = discuss time permitting > > Reports, Etc. > ------------- > Upcoming telecons > > Next FtF > > The Forms Newsletter/News items > > XForms 1.1 > Implementation report progress > > XForms Basic 1.0, 1.1 > > Rich Web Application Backplane > > > Action Items > ------------ > Action Item List: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2009Mar/0052.html > > Administrative Issues > --------------------- > XSLTForms to list of implementations > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2009Apr/0002.html > > Fix our shortname issue > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007Nov/0096.html > http://www.w3.org/2005/05/tr-versions > > W3C Spec matrix > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Nov/0071.html > - Discussed on Nov. 26, 2008 > > > PROGRESS ON WORKING GROUP GOALS > =============================== > > Issue Classification > ---------------------- > > * XForms 1.1 Completion > ----------------------- > * Issues > - - - - > - When to use resource attribute > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2009Mar/0028.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-editor/2009Mar/0000.html > > * Test suite changes > - - - - - - - - - - > - Modifications from action items on various group members > > - Non-XHTML in test suite > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2009Apr/0011.html > > - What are the remaining obstacles to XForms 1.1 advancement? > > 3.3.1.c3 Multiple schemas single namespace (have one, need one) > 4.2.4.a xforms-model-destruct after submission (have one, need one) > 8.1.a navindex and accesskey (have one, need one) > > 8.1.6.a mediatype attribute on upload (have one, need one) > 8.1.6.b incremental attribute on upload (have one, need one) > 8.1.6.d data binding restriction for upload (have one, need one) > 8.1.10.a selection attribute on select (have one, need one) > > 10.4.f delete action and repeat element (need two) > 11.1.v includenamespaceprefixes attr on submission (have one, need > one) > > 11.9.p mailto multipart-post submission (have none, need one?) > 11.9.q mailto form-data-post submission (have one, need zero?) > > 11.9.4.b delete submission deletes a file (have none, need one?) > > > > Advancing XForms for HTML > ------------------------- > - Assertions > - Examples > - Test Suite > > - Rationalization of XForms for HTML, RDFa, and ARIA > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2009Mar/0044.html > > * XForms 1.2 Features > --------------------- > - Context everywhere, context on bind > - Data driven switch > - case() > - Better expression of default trigger > - submissions that put and get binary resources > - setting submission method default to "get" > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2009Feb/0065.html > - Ability to suppress RRRR on submission completion > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2009Mar/0007.html > - Lazy authoring improvement: empty instance exists even if no refs > > - repeat and relevance/enabled/disabled > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2009Mar/0007.html > > > Review Possibilities > JSON submissions? > submission to a "new" window? > mediatype="text/html" on textarea for rich text content? > XML Events 2? > Dialogs? > Model improvements (optional, nested, external/src, exceptions)? > UI event notification improvements? > See older issues below? > > Analyzing Modularization for AJAX Programmers > --------------------------------------------- > > Modularization of XForms based on markup seemed at one point a > necessary > step of decoupling modules against which APIs could be written. > However, the working group now wants to approach the problem by > starting > with the needed APIs and letting the modularization requirements > follow. > > XForms 2.0 > ---------- > > Refactor dependencies to detect automatic rebuild conditions and > reduce circular dependencies > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008May/att-0069/2008-05-28.html#topic6 > > Review possibilities > > Older issues > ------------ > Currency data values, etc. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Sep/0041.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Sep/0043.html > > Validity notification on initial or hidden data > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2008May/0015.html > - Isn't it about time we add an xforms-control-initialize event? > - Seems we need it for modularization to work right > - Defer to face to face meeting > > The xforms-link-exception > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2008Aug/0001.html > Discussed Aug. 20, 2008. Need to dispatch xforms-link-error to > instance rather than link-exception to model. For legacy, if the > link-error bubbles up to model, it could throw link-exception, but > then the author can prevent the exception by cancelling the error > Note: xforms-link-error is not currently cancellable > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2008Aug/0003.html > > xforms-submit-done response-body and host language submission result > targeting > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008May/0048.html > Discussed 21 May 2008; perhaps only for replace="none" > Concern was about efficiency. Could add "want-response-body" > default false in > xforms-submit, then if turned true the response-body would be non- > empty in the > xforms-submit-done. Host language could then push response-body > content to > a new window. > > xforms-submit-serialize receives empty submission-body value > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Nov/0061.html > Discussed 03 Dec 2008; decided to allow future version feature that > helps control whether submission body is empty on start > Context info of xforms-submit could provide a writable flag > > > ============================================= > > [[Magic for irc channel: > > /invite zakim > zakim, this will be forms > /invite rrsagent > rrsagent, make log public > > Meeting: Weekly Forms WG Teleconference > Agenda: <url of this message> > Chair: <whoever> > Scribe: <whoever> (use exact IRC name, or add "scribenick: irc_name") > Regrets: <name>, <name>, ... > Topic: <topic 1> > ... minutes ... > Resolution: ... resolution ... > Topic: <topic 2> > ... > ACTION: <someone> to <something> > ... > > Use sed edits to fix previous lines, like s/Steve/Steven/ > > *** AT THE END OF THE CALL, rrsagent will list the actions by typing > actions? > > *** Zakim will announce who was present by typing > zakim, bye > > *** rrsagent dismissal > rrsagent, make minutes > rrsagent, bye > > *** If someone by chance dismisses rrsagent before the minutes > *** are made, just invite rrsagent back > > ]] -- Orbeon Forms - Web Forms for the Enterprise Done the Right Way http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2009 12:07:50 UTC