W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-forms@w3.org > March 2009

XForms 1.1 - repeat relevance & editorial tweaks.

From: Vlad Trakhtenberg <vladt@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:14:59 -0700
To: www-forms@w3.org, www-forms-editor@w3.org
Cc: public-forms@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFB86D4EE7.22343B59-ON88257575.006B1671-88257578.00014E12@ca.ibm.com>
Dear WG,

Is there a compelling reason for the provision that 
xforms-disabled/enabled event cannot target repeat (4.4.1 -4.4.11) and 
repeat control cannot be relevant or non-relevant (8.1.1)?

Perhaps a repeat can become non-relevant'(relevant)  and the  
xforms-disabled (enabled ) fire when it does not have any (has at least 
one) relevant repeat items (item)?

And a couple of minor issues:

1. Typo in 8.1.1: Second bullet:
Form controls that read or write simpleContent produce this exception 
whenever and as soon as they are bound to an element node that an element 
child node.

2. The very first link: (not terribly useful ;) 
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-xforms11-20090311/  does not work.

Vlad Trakhtenberg.
Received on Friday, 13 March 2009 00:15:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:58 UTC