Re: Straw poll on name of "streamlined syntax" spec

I remember asking the same question last week -- or may be it was
the week before -- just ship this as XForms 1.2

Charles F Wiecha writes:
 > 
 > So how about making this just XForms 1.2 and pushing the other 1.2 stuff
 > into 1.3 or 2.0...Charlie
 > 
 > Charles Wiecha
 > Manager, Multichannel Web Interaction
 > IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
 > P.O. Box 704
 > Yorktown Heights, N.Y.  10598
 > Phone: (914) 784-6180, T/L 863-6180, Cell: (914) 320-2614
 > wiecha@us.ibm.com
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >                                                                                                                                               
 >   From:       "Mark Birbeck" <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>                                                                                  
 >                                                                                                                                               
 >   To:         "Ulrich Nicolas Liss$(ÿ >                                                                                                                                               
 >   Cc:         "John Boyer" <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>, public-forms@w3.org                                                                           
 >                                                                                                                                               
 >   Date:       11/17/2008 10:03 AM                                                                                                             
 >                                                                                                                                               
 >   Subject:    Re: Straw poll on name of "streamlined syntax" spec                                                                             
 >                                                                                                                                               
 >   Sent by:    public-forms-request@w3.org                                                                                                     
 >                                                                                                                                               
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > Hi Uli,
 > 
 > > I prefer XFormsA and oppose to FormsA
 > >
 > > Even more I'd prefer something like XForms Basic, but that's already in
 > > use for a profile. I find the uppercase "A" a bit awkward, but a
 > > lowercase "a" is even more awkward, and "-a" is expected to perform
 > > badly in terms of Google searches. Maybe XForms Compact could do the
 > trick.
 > 
 > I agree with you 110%. :)
 > 
 > When we first started talking about this, I always saw the project as
 > more of an "XForms-lite", or "XForms Tiny" type thing. Those kinds of
 > names -- and your "XForms Compact" -- convey the sense of the spec
 > being an easy on-ramp, at the same time that it is part of the big,
 > happy, XForms, family.
 > 
 > If I had to pick a preference, I'd probably go for XForms-lite.
 > 
 > But I would also flag up the fact that we don't necessarily need a new
 > name at all.
 > 
 > This is because most web developers have not even heard of XForms. So
 > creating a new document that describes a set of 'on-ramp' features,
 > does not necessarily require us to come up with a new name for this
 > spec. In fact, this new spec could just be an XForms Primer, or some
 > such, that prioritises the on-ramp features in the interests of
 > gaining wider interest in XForms amongst web developers and the Ajax
 > community.
 > 
 > Regards,
 > 
 > Mark
 > 
 > --
 > Mark Birbeck, webBackplane
 > 
 > mark.birbeck@webBackplane.com
 > 
 > http://webBackplane.com/mark-birbeck
 > 
 > webBackplane is a trading name of Backplane Ltd. (company number
 > 05972288, registered office: 2nd Floor, 69/85 Tabernacle Street,
 > London, EC2A 4RR)
 > 
 > 

-- 
Best Regards,
--raman

Title:  Research Scientist      
Email:  raman@google.com
WWW:    http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/
Google: tv+raman 
GTalk:  raman@google.com, tv.raman.tv@gmail.com
PGP:    http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc

Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2008 22:41:38 UTC