W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-forms@w3.org > November 2008

Re: Straw poll on name of "streamlined syntax" spec

From: Charles F Wiecha <wiecha@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 10:19:50 -0500
To: "Mark Birbeck" <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
Cc: "John Boyer" <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>, public-forms@w3.org, public-forms-request@w3.org, "Ulrich Nicolas Lissť" <unl@dreamlab.net>
Message-ID: <OF40004247.62A8D131-ON85257504.00542C48-85257504.00542A5B@us.ibm.com>

So how about making this just XForms 1.2 and pushing the other 1.2 stuff
into 1.3 or 2.0...Charlie

Charles Wiecha
Manager, Multichannel Web Interaction
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
P.O. Box 704
Yorktown Heights, N.Y.  10598
Phone: (914) 784-6180, T/L 863-6180, Cell: (914) 320-2614

  From:       "Mark Birbeck" <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>                                                                                  
  To:         "Ulrich Nicolas Lissť" <unl@dreamlab.net>                                                                                       
  Cc:         "John Boyer" <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>, public-forms@w3.org                                                                           
  Date:       11/17/2008 10:03 AM                                                                                                             
  Subject:    Re: Straw poll on name of "streamlined syntax" spec                                                                             
  Sent by:    public-forms-request@w3.org                                                                                                     

Hi Uli,

> I prefer XFormsA and oppose to FormsA
> Even more I'd prefer something like XForms Basic, but that's already in
> use for a profile. I find the uppercase "A" a bit awkward, but a
> lowercase "a" is even more awkward, and "-a" is expected to perform
> badly in terms of Google searches. Maybe XForms Compact could do the

I agree with you 110%. :)

When we first started talking about this, I always saw the project as
more of an "XForms-lite", or "XForms Tiny" type thing. Those kinds of
names -- and your "XForms Compact" -- convey the sense of the spec
being an easy on-ramp, at the same time that it is part of the big,
happy, XForms, family.

If I had to pick a preference, I'd probably go for XForms-lite.

But I would also flag up the fact that we don't necessarily need a new
name at all.

This is because most web developers have not even heard of XForms. So
creating a new document that describes a set of 'on-ramp' features,
does not necessarily require us to come up with a new name for this
spec. In fact, this new spec could just be an XForms Primer, or some
such, that prioritises the on-ramp features in the interests of
gaining wider interest in XForms amongst web developers and the Ajax



Mark Birbeck, webBackplane



webBackplane is a trading name of Backplane Ltd. (company number
05972288, registered office: 2nd Floor, 69/85 Tabernacle Street,
London, EC2A 4RR)

(image/gif attachment: graycol.gif)

(image/gif attachment: ecblank.gif)

Received on Monday, 17 November 2008 15:34:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:13:58 UTC