Re: Renaming target attribute of submission

One issue with the name "response" is that in HTTP, request and  
response don't only include the body, they also include status code  
and headers [1]. However this attribute would only handle the response  



On Apr 25, 2008, at 4:54 PM, John Boyer wrote:

> Not to preempt Steven's action item to figure out a new name, but I  
> was travelling through the submission text for other reasons, and it  
> seems we have pretty consistent language around the term  
> 'response'.  Also, this is the name that Leigh suggested on the last  
> telecon (I think we got caught up in discussing the problems with it  
> being a child element, and didn't therefore notice it might be a  
> good name for the attribute).
> So, what about 'response' as a new name for 'target'?  The response  
> attribute would provide an XPath to indicate where to put the  
> submission response.
> Cheers,
> John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
> Senior Technical Staff Member
> Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher
> Chair, W3C Forms Working Group
> Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
> IBM Victoria Software Lab
> E-Mail:
> Blog:
> Blog RSS feed:

Orbeon Forms - Web Forms for the Enterprise Done the Right Way

Received on Saturday, 26 April 2008 00:22:45 UTC