- From: Klotz, Leigh <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:55:06 -0700
- To: "John Boyer" <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>, "Forms WG (new)" <public-forms@w3.org>
- Cc: <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Received on Friday, 25 April 2008 23:57:50 UTC
Gee, I like it... ________________________________ From: public-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:public-forms-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of John Boyer Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 4:54 PM To: Forms WG (new) Cc: steven.pemberton@cwi.nl Subject: Renaming target attribute of submission Not to preempt Steven's action item to figure out a new name, but I was travelling through the submission text for other reasons, and it seems we have pretty consistent language around the term 'response'. Also, this is the name that Leigh suggested on the last telecon (I think we got caught up in discussing the problems with it being a child element, and didn't therefore notice it might be a good name for the attribute). So, what about 'response' as a new name for 'target'? The response attribute would provide an XPath to indicate where to put the submission response. Cheers, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. Senior Technical Staff Member Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer <http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer> Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw <http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw>
Received on Friday, 25 April 2008 23:57:50 UTC