- From: Rogelio Pérez Cano <rogeliop@satec.es>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 11:41:32 +0200
- To: "'Forms WG \(new\)'" <public-forms@w3.org>
Hi Erik, all, please correct me if I´m wrong but at least in XHTML 1.0 Strict the "target" attribute doesn´t exist, so I´m not sure if it´s going to be a problem, for sure xhtml/html experts in the group may have better opinion on it. Regards. Roger. -----Mensaje original----- De: public-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:public-forms-request@w3.org] En nombre de Erik Bruchez Enviado el: martes, 08 de abril de 2008 2:24 Para: Forms WG (new) Asunto: Unfortunate choice of attribute name in XForms 1.1: xforms:submission/@target All, It just occurred to me that the XForms 1.1 xforms:submission/@target attribute [1] is badly chosen. The reason is that a "target", in HTML speak, specifies an optional target window or frame. This, in particular, applies to <a> and <form> in HTML. [2] In the future, we may want to officially support such a concept of target window or frame in XForms. Purely out of familiarity with HTML, the name "target" would be an obvious choice. But if we use "target" now to specify the destination for data replacement, we won't be able to use that name. (Note that in our implementation, we already support an extension attribute called xxforms:target on xforms:submission and xforms:load, which behaves like its HTML counterpart.) For this reason I suggest that we change the name of this attribute in XForms 1.1. Suggestions are welcome, but "destination" could work. -Erik [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms11/#submit [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/present/frames.html#adef-target -- Orbeon Forms - Web Forms for the Enterprise Done the Right Way http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2008 09:41:58 UTC