RE: test case for bind/@type validation and first text node rule

David,
As always, your insight is valuable.  It would have been somewhat more
valuable had you been able to participate in the face to face meeting,
even by IRC, but I understand you may have business contraints.  Please
continue to provide feedback on this issue.
Leigh.

-----Original Message-----
From: David Landwehr [mailto:david.landwehr@picoforms.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 11:35 AM
To: Klotz, Leigh
Cc: public-forms@w3.org
Subject: Re: test case for bind/@type validation and first text node
rule

Okay, then I really regret that Roland and I spend time on the issue  
at the time; now when the work turned out so fruitless. I hope that  
this second iteration will come up with something good. I'll leave it  
to you and look forward to hear the conclusion :-)

Best regards,
David

On Jun 19, 2007, at 7:57 PM, Klotz, Leigh wrote:

>
> Yes, it's the same issue but that isn't the message that started  
> it; it
> was a last-call comment.
> I typed in this example down from fragements written on the whiteboard
> where we explored some of the test cases.
> Leigh.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:public-forms-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of David Landwehr
> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 2:15 PM
> To: Klotz, Leigh
> Cc: public-forms@w3.org
> Subject: Re: test case for bind/@type validation and first text node
> rule
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Is this the same issue as http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-
> forms/2004AprJun/0016.html ?
>
> Best regards,
> David
>
> On Jun 15, 2007, at 10:48 PM, Leigh L Klotz, Jr. wrote:
>
>> This example highlights a number unfortunate issues with the first
>> text-node child rule highlighted by John Boyer and Erik Bruchez.
>> <firstnode.xhtml>
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 18:44:06 UTC