- From: David Landwehr <david.landwehr@picoforms.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:34:30 +0200
- To: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
- Cc: <public-forms@w3.org>
Okay, then I really regret that Roland and I spend time on the issue at the time; now when the work turned out so fruitless. I hope that this second iteration will come up with something good. I'll leave it to you and look forward to hear the conclusion :-) Best regards, David On Jun 19, 2007, at 7:57 PM, Klotz, Leigh wrote: > > Yes, it's the same issue but that isn't the message that started > it; it > was a last-call comment. > I typed in this example down from fragements written on the whiteboard > where we explored some of the test cases. > Leigh. > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:public-forms-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of David Landwehr > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 2:15 PM > To: Klotz, Leigh > Cc: public-forms@w3.org > Subject: Re: test case for bind/@type validation and first text node > rule > > > Hi all, > > Is this the same issue as http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c- > forms/2004AprJun/0016.html ? > > Best regards, > David > > On Jun 15, 2007, at 10:48 PM, Leigh L Klotz, Jr. wrote: > >> This example highlights a number unfortunate issues with the first >> text-node child rule highlighted by John Boyer and Erik Bruchez. >> <firstnode.xhtml> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 18:34:56 UTC