- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:43:53 -0700
- To: Forms WG (new) <public-forms@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF8AB8F123.300D8D76-ON88257324.007A37A7-88257324.007CDEAE@ca.ibm.com>
The issue of ordered children of submission came up on the Wednesday telecon. On the telecon it was stated that it was hard in XML schema to specify child elements that were both optional and in a required order. I preserved this aspect of submission in the current editor's draft because I do not understand why it is hard, whereas I can easily see it being harder to write a schema that says the child is optional but could appear anywhere in the list of child elements. It is easy to see how to do it if the schema also allows the child to appear any number of times, but this is not what we want. Isn't it just a case of saying that the submission has a resource element with minoccurs=0 then a method element with minoccurs=0 then a header element with minoccurs=0 and maxoccurs=unbounded? Is there an easy way to say "In any order, one or zero resource plus one or zero method plus zero or more header"? Cheers, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. STSM: Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
Received on Thursday, 26 July 2007 22:44:06 UTC