- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:06:37 -0700
- To: ebruchez@orbeon.com
- Cc: "Forms WG (new)" <public-forms@w3.org>, public-forms-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF3EF7CBF9.3800AD00-ON88257324.00792AA8-88257324.00797567@ca.ibm.com>
Hi Erik, Given that both "" and "none" are not mimetypes, I agree with you that there is no advantage to "", and now that I see serialization="none" in the spec, I agree that it is clearer than serialization="". Please see the latest editor's draft available from the website for the changes. Good call. Cheers, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. STSM: Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com> Sent by: public-forms-request@w3.org 07/26/2007 10:46 AM Please respond to ebruchez@orbeon.com To "Forms WG (new)" <public-forms@w3.org> cc Subject Re: serialization="" Good point. But I should point out that there have been lots of complaints that XML namespaces are confusing ;-) -Erik Nick_Van_den_Bleeken@inventivegroup.com wrote: > and when using namespaces xmlns="" > > Nick Van den Bleeken - Research & Development > Inventive Designers > Phone: +32 - 3 - 8210170 > Fax: +32 - 3 - 8210171 > Email: Nick_Van_den_Bleeken@inventivegroup.com > > > > "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com> > Sent by: public-forms-request@w3.org > 07/25/2007 11:08 PM > > To > <ebruchez@orbeon.com>, "Forms WG (new)" <public-forms@w3.org> > cc > > Subject > RE: serialization="" > > > > > > > > Just FYI we also use a "" in includenamespaceprefixes. > Leigh. > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:public-forms-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Erik Bruchez > Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 1:48 PM > To: Forms WG (new) > Subject: serialization="" > > > All, > > We thought about this at Orbeon and we think that using a blank value > for the attribute remains awkward. It is pretty much unseen in XML-based > > languages out there, and it could also indicate that the developer has > forgotten to put a value for the attribute. > > "none" is not a media type, but neither is a blank string. So I am going > > to be a flip-flopper here and get back to the idea that "none" is > preferable to an empty attribute. > > -Erik > -- Orbeon Forms - Web Forms for the Enterprise Done the Right Way http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Thursday, 26 July 2007 22:06:49 UTC