W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-forms@w3.org > July 2007

Re: Response to action item about xsi:type processing in the absence of a schema

From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:03:36 -0700
To: ebruchez@orbeon.com
Cc: "Forms WG" <public-forms@w3.org>, www-forms-editor@w3.org, www-forms-editor-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF7D64F19F.2D70B901-ON88257322.00162A1B-88257322.00164D10@ca.ibm.com>
Done, thanks.

John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
STSM: Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher
Chair, W3C Forms Working Group
Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
IBM Victoria Software Lab
E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com 

Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer

Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com> 
Sent by: www-forms-editor-request@w3.org
07/17/2007 09:26 AM
Please respond to

"Forms WG" <public-forms@w3.org>
Response to action item about xsi:type processing in the absence  of a 


This email is in response to the following action item assigned to me:

   Erik to recommend where the spec should be clarified about xsi:type 

As a reminder of the issue at hand:

* This came up when the following comment was being considered:


* The WG seemed to agree that even in the absence of an imported
   schema, xsi:type attribute on instance data should be processed.

* However, the spec does not clearly state that this must happen. So
   we want to add a clarification.

* My task is to identify the best location in the spec to clarify

I think that the best place is "4.3.5 The xforms-revalidate Event",
which already mentions xsi:type processing. We should add a note in
that section. I suggest the following wording:

   "NOTE: xsi:type attributes on instance data elements are processed
    even in the absence of external or inline schema."

There is already a note in this section. I suggest placing this new
note right before the existing note.

Note that this does not address the issue of allowing the use case of
loading an instance containing xsi:type attributes without triggering
schema processing. This is a separate issue, that may be covered by
the following email:


This should satisfy this action item. The next step is for the WG to
accept this change and introduce it in the spec.


Orbeon Forms - Web Forms for the Enterprise Done the Right Way
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2007 04:03:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:13:52 UTC