- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 17:25:35 -0700
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: public-forms@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF9A04FFC9.0204CF62-ON8825730F.00016FFE-8825730F.00025932@ca.ibm.com>
Hi Chris, I was also reviewing the deliverables and milestones for the working group and again noticed that the disconnect between them has not been addressed. The deliverables include XForms 1.2, but the milestones table contains no mention of it. I originally thought it best to have a row of dates added for XForms 1.2, but frankly, I do not think that the working group can do more than 1.1, 2.0 and transitional in the time alloted. To a large extent, I would guess that XForms transitional *is* 1.2. Perhaps it is best to simply consolidate the two, e.g. XForms Transitional/1.2, or if that is not possible, then just go with XForms Transitional because it will already be clear that any changes to a full XForms processor that are needed to help build XForms transitional will just implicitly happen and will have to be versioned up from 1.1 anyway. Thanks, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. STSM: Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2007 00:25:47 UTC