W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-forms@w3.org > July 2007

Re: Plugin v. Extension and AJAX, was Re: charter all set now?

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 00:18:35 +0200
Message-ID: <69293838.20070705001835@w3.org>
To: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
Cc: mark.birbeck@x-port.net, public-forms@w3.org

On Thursday, July 5, 2007, 12:08:47 AM, John wrote:

JB> Hi Mark and Chris, 
JB> Based on the feedback, I would've thought that the sentence would
JB> have contained "(through extensions, plugins or AJAX)" or
JB> something like that.  Taking the time to mention 'extension'
JB> distinctly from plugin seems at least somewhat worthwhile for the
JB> reasons you (Mark) mentioned, though I agree that I don't see much
JB> difference really.  Mentioning AJAX in addition to plugins seems
JB> far more important as we do have vendors delivering XForms
JB> capability or content+capability to the client side without a
JB> plugin/extension by using AJAX.  In fact, I think you're (Mark is)
JB> probably one in that camp too, now that I think about it. 
JB> So, Chris, would it be possible to further amend as above?  

It all looks like clarificatory, editorial wording and not a change of
scope, so I don't see a problem with it.

 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Interaction Domain Leader
 Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Wednesday, 4 July 2007 22:19:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:13:52 UTC