- From: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:10:45 +0200
- To: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- CC: "Forms WG (new)" <public-forms@w3.org>
Mark, Shane: I have not received acknowledgment of this email. Could you please respond at lest to the part about the process to follow? Thanks, -Erik Erik Bruchez wrote: > > Mark, Shane: > > Following a discussion in this thread [1], I have an action item [2] > from the XForms Working Group to contact you to suggest an enhancement > to the ev:event attribute in order to allow registering an event > handler for multiple events without resorting to using an additional > <ev:listener> element. > > As far as we could tell, the only way to do this purely with the XML > syntax today is to write (here in the context of XForms): > > <xf:action ev:event="some-event" id="handler"> > ... > </xf:action> > <ev:listener event="some-other-event" handler="#handler"/> > > The suggestion is to enhance the ev:event attribute to support a list > of events rather than a single event. You would then write instead: > > <xf:action ev:event="some-event some-other-event"> > ... > </xf:action> > > This would be a much more concise syntax which would not require form > authors to learn ev:listener. The result is also quite easy to read. > > There are obviously precedents for using lists of space-separated > names, in particular the following two come to mind immediately: > > * List of CSS classes in HTML @class attributes > * List of XML schemas on xforms:model/@schema > > Note that [1] discusses a slightly more complex case where the event > handler is attached to two different observers. The solution above > would probably not work in this case, although a similar suggestion > could be made for the ev:observer attribute: > > <xf:action ev:event="some-event" ev:observer="observer1 observer2"> > ... > </xf:action> > > What is the best way to have this suggestion duly taken into account > by the people in charge of XML Events? Is this email sufficient? > > Thanks, > > -Erik > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2007Apr/0042.html > [2] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007May/att-0058/20070516-2.html#ACTION5 > > -- Orbeon Forms - Web Forms for the Enterprise Done the Right Way http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Monday, 27 August 2007 16:10:45 UTC