- From: Michał 'rysiek' Woźniak <rysiek@fwioo.pl>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 14:08:29 +0200
- To: public-fedsocweb@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2013 12:27:41 UTC
Dnia czwartek, 13 czerwca 2013 o 02:07:50 Melvin Carvalho napisał(a): > On 13 June 2013 00:58, Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> wrote: > > Michał 'rysiek' Woźniak wrote: > >> Yup... rough consensus and running code, then the market tends to drive > >> > >>> what gets adopted. > >> > >> What the rough consensus is, please, can you tell me? Or point to a > >> document > >> that describes it? > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-resnick-on-consensus/?include_text=1 As I already stated, I do understand what a rough consensus is in general. I am having hard time finding out what the rough consensus is in the particular case of federated social web -- apart from "it's impossible and not doable, leave it", but if it is indeed the rough consensus of this list, why does this list even exist? -- Pozdrawiam Michał "rysiek" Woźniak Fundacja Wolnego i Otwartego Oprogramowania
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2013 12:27:41 UTC