- From: Michael Haschke <michael.haschke@eye48.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:18:33 +0200
- To: public-fedsocweb@w3.org
Hi *, 2012/7/9 Melvin Carvalho: > If I've understood correctly, the branding of the FSW here would be to say, > 'were not facebook', and try to exclude them. However a more practical, and > mature, approach would be to be open to work with anyone, imho. +1 (a big fat plus one), inclusion > exclusion! I thought that borderless communication is one goal of the whole FSW movement, to make it that big/important that also wallet gardens have to really open their doors. I do not want to judge people who do not be able to install complicated software, or don't want to use new/unknown FSW providers with not-so-good-usability. If they are feeling good on Facebook/Twitter/XYZ (with all their bad policies and data collections), why not -- as long as I can connect with them without being on Facebook/Twitter/XYZ myself (sadly not possible right now). So I would prefer a somehow neutral question like "What is your link/profile/web home?", and I would be open to various answers, e.g. "It's facebook/name", or "My WebId is http://me.example.com/" -- as long as we can connect. Just my 2 cents about the vision, regards... Haschek -- Portfolio: http://48augen.de/ Profile/WebID: http://michael.haschke.biz/ *New* Blog: http://blog.eye48.com/
Received on Monday, 9 July 2012 08:19:26 UTC