- From: Antonio Tapiador del Dujo <atapiador@dit.upm.es>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 12:20:29 +0200
- To: public-fedsocweb@w3.org
Hi Melvin, On 09/07/12 09:06, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > > If I've understood correctly, the branding of the FSW here would be to > say, 'were not facebook', and try to exclude them. However a more > practical, and mature, approach would be to be open to work with > anyone, imho. > The proposal never intended to mean that. Is not just about being different from Facebook. It is about having a common identity that ensures you can interact with other users, regardless the social network they are in. Facebook would be able to open their walled gardens and join at any time.
Received on Monday, 9 July 2012 10:20:57 UTC