Re: Archive Module -revival

Thanks John

I was mainly thinking about naming issues

Mohamed


On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:24 AM, John Lumley <john@saxonica.com> wrote:

>  On 04/02/2014 19:36, Innovimax W3C wrote:
>
>  It might be good keeping sync with
> http://gildas-lormeau.github.io/zip.js/core-api.html
>
>  Just saying
>
>  Mohamed
>
>
> Thanks Mohamed. It appears to me that apart from zip.js's architecture
> being callback-centric, it's operating generally at a rather lower level
> than we're proposing for Archive. Could you suggest a few specific ways
> that the two might for example be in conflict? I can certainly see that
> keeping (attribute) names in sync. could be useful.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:52 AM, John Lumley <john@saxonica.com> wrote:
>
>>  Gentlefolk,
>> The Archive Module http://expath.org/spec/archive has been somewhat put
>> on the back burner since the September draft while getting the Binary and
>> File modules close to or at 1.0 status, but it's about time it got a little
>> more attention.
>>
>>
> --
> Innovimax SARL
> Consulting, Training & XML Development
> 9, impasse des Orteaux
> 75020 Paris
> Tel : +33 9 52 475787
> Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
> http://www.innovimax.fr
> RCS Paris 488.018.631
> SARL au capital de 10.000 EURO
>
>
> --
> *John Lumley* MA PhD CEng FIEE
> john@saxonica.com
> on behalf of Saxonica Ltd
>



-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 EURO