- From: John Lumley <john@saxonica.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 10:24:00 +0000
- To: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
- CC: EXPath ML <public-expath@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 10:24:21 UTC
On 04/02/2014 19:36, Innovimax W3C wrote: > It might be good keeping sync with > http://gildas-lormeau.github.io/zip.js/core-api.html > > Just saying > > Mohamed Thanks Mohamed. It appears to me that apart from zip.js's architecture being callback-centric, it's operating generally at a rather lower level than we're proposing for Archive. Could you suggest a few specific ways that the two might for example be in conflict? I can certainly see that keeping (attribute) names in sync. could be useful. > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:52 AM, John Lumley <john@saxonica.com > <mailto:john@saxonica.com>> wrote: > > Gentlefolk, > The Archive Module http://expath.org/spec/archive has been > somewhat put on the back burner since the September draft while > getting the Binary and File modules close to or at 1.0 status, but > it's about time it got a little more attention. > > > -- > Innovimax SARL > Consulting, Training & XML Development > 9, impasse des Orteaux > 75020 Paris > Tel : +33 9 52 475787 > Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 > http://www.innovimax.fr > RCS Paris 488.018.631 > SARL au capital de 10.000 EUR -- *John Lumley* MA PhD CEng FIEE john@saxonica.com <mailto:john@saxonica.com> on behalf of Saxonica Ltd
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 10:24:21 UTC