Re: Archive Module -revival

On 04/02/2014 19:36, Innovimax W3C wrote:
> It might be good keeping sync with 
> http://gildas-lormeau.github.io/zip.js/core-api.html
>
> Just saying
>
> Mohamed

Thanks Mohamed. It appears to me that apart from zip.js's architecture 
being callback-centric, it's operating generally at a rather lower level 
than we're proposing for Archive. Could you suggest a few specific ways 
that the two might for example be in conflict? I can certainly see that 
keeping (attribute) names in sync. could be useful.

>
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:52 AM, John Lumley <john@saxonica.com 
> <mailto:john@saxonica.com>> wrote:
>
>     Gentlefolk,
>     The Archive Module http://expath.org/spec/archive has been
>     somewhat put on the back burner since the September draft while
>     getting the Binary and File modules close to or at 1.0 status, but
>     it's about time it got a little more attention.
>
>
> -- 
> Innovimax SARL
> Consulting, Training & XML Development
> 9, impasse des Orteaux
> 75020 Paris
> Tel : +33 9 52 475787
> Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
> http://www.innovimax.fr
> RCS Paris 488.018.631
> SARL au capital de 10.000 EUR

-- 
*John Lumley* MA PhD CEng FIEE
john@saxonica.com <mailto:john@saxonica.com>
on behalf of Saxonica Ltd