- From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 21:48:09 +0200
- To: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Cc: Matthias Brantner <matthias.brantner@28msec.com>, public-expath@w3.org, Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com>
Matthias, Yes, good idea! I thought about XSpec for the same reasons, but the new FOTS is a very good candidate too. I'd be interested in seeing what such tests would be in FOTS... Regards, -- Florent Georges http://fgeorges.org/ http://h2oconsulting.be/ On 10 May 2012 21:09, Innovimax SARL wrote: > Matthias, > > This is a huge idea ! > > Are you volunteering to convert the existing tests to FOTS ? This would > indeed help non-Java implementation like yours ! > > Regards, > > Mohamed > > > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Matthias Brantner > <matthias.brantner@28msec.com> wrote: >> >> Thanks Christian for sharing your tests. That's a great start. However, >> wouldn't it be nice to use the new >> W3C FOTS way to describe and run tests? This would make it a lot easier >> for non-java processors to run >> the tests. As far as I know, most of the implementations are already able >> to process this test description >> format. >> >> Matthias >> >> On May 10, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Innovimax SARL wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> Christian Grün from Base X just gave the link to some test they are using >> for BaseX >> >> These test are under a BSD licence so it means anybody could use them >> >> First, thanks to Christian to have made such tests available >> >> They are provided as Java JUnit test >> >> If I'm right all but one implementation that are in the implementation >> matrix are Java based. >> >> It means that people may use those test >> >> If some people could try to make those tests run against other >> implementation we could start collecting results >> >> Of course, if there is other test case available somewhere else, please >> tell us >> >> Thanks >> >> Mohamed >> >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Christian Grün >> <christian.gruen@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> We have written several JUnit tests for most of the implemented >>> specifications.. >>> >>> >>> https://github.com/BaseXdb/basex/tree/master/src/test/java/org/basex/test/query/func >>> >>> ..some of which could probably be adapted for general use. >>> >>> Looking forward to everyone's opinions, >>> Christian >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Innovimax SARL >> Consulting, Training & XML Development >> 9, impasse des Orteaux >> 75020 Paris >> Tel : +33 9 52 475787 >> Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 >> http://www.innovimax.fr >> RCS Paris 488.018.631 >> SARL au capital de 10.000 € >> >> > > > > -- > Innovimax SARL > Consulting, Training & XML Development > 9, impasse des Orteaux > 75020 Paris > Tel : +33 9 52 475787 > Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 > http://www.innovimax.fr > RCS Paris 488.018.631 > SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Thursday, 10 May 2012 19:49:00 UTC