Re: Valid XML from Jim Ley on 2005-05-22 (public-evangelist@w3.org from May 2005)

From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 00:32:07 +0100
To: <public-evangelist@w3.org>
Message-ID: <032a01c55f26$785cf0c0$0200000a@Snufkin>

"Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>
>It's funny how people don't read. :)))
>I haven't said you _have to_ use "XHTML 1.0". I said you can use it  if it 
>suits your needs. I use it on my personal project because I  need it. 
>Period. :)

No, _you_ haven't, unfortunately lots of people the evangelism community 
have, and even more choose to use it even if suggesting that there is a 
choice.   Criticisms of XHTML 1.0 as text/html evangelism is not a criticism 
of you Karl, whilst I cannot understand your conclusion that serving XHTML 
1.0 in a weird "compatible" way is a pragmatic approach, I do believe you 
arrived at it after careful thought.

Jim.

Received on Sunday, 22 May 2005 23:32:18 UTC