- From: Osma Suominen <osma.suominen@helsinki.fi>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 11:01:08 +0200
- To: public-esw-thes@w3.org
It was even released by Holger Knublauch on the SHACL mailing list: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2015Aug/0115.html -Osma 20.01.2016, 10:46, Osma Suominen wrote: > Hi Antoine! > > I just noticed this item in the TopBraid 5.1.0 release notes [1]: > > - Feature: Added SHACL library for SKOS constraints. > > So apparently SHACL rules for SKOS constraints have already been > developed (by TopQuadrant I assume). Which is maybe not a big surprise, > since they've had SPIN rules for SKOS for quite some time and SHACL is > in some ways a successor of SPIN (with TopQuadrant represented in the > SHACL WG) and SKOS ICs were also one of the initial use cases for SHACL > [2]. > > -Osma > > [1] http://www.topquadrant.com/docs/versions/changes-5.1.txt > > [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl-ucr/#uc21-skos-constraints > > > > 18.01.2016, 09:32, Antoine Isaac kirjoitti: >> Thanks a lot, Osma! >> This is really good to have. >> And in a way confirms the interest of wait-and-seeing until we can start >> playing with SHACL / RDF Shapes (arguably closer to SPIN). >> >> To come back to Simon's comment. Yes OWL2 is good, but having an OWL1 >> representation already allows to use SKOS in OWL2 context (i.e. it >> specifies which classes and properties are in the SKOS vocabulary). What >> we're missing then is a handful of contraints from the SKOS model, which >> OWL2 may anyway not allow one to capture in the way most people would >> need them (i.e. in a 'closed-world' manner). >> >> Best, >> >> Antoine >> >> On 1/18/16 8:18 AM, Osma Suominen wrote: >>> On 17/01/16 12:29, Antoine Isaac wrote: >>>> I'm actually a bit surprised I couldn't find a trace of an earlier >>>> attempt... >>> >>> Are you perhaps referring to Paul Hermans' series of blog posts from >>> 2010 where he attempted to express some of the SKOS ICs using OWL2 and >>> SPIN? His conclusion at the time was that most of them couldn't be >>> represented in OWL2. >>> >>> The blog is long gone now but the posts are still available thanks to >>> the Internet Archive: >>> >>> https://web.archive.org/web/20130522054521/http://www.proxml.be/users/paul/weblog/aaad2/Integrity_constraints_in_SKOS_part_1_.html >>> >>> >>> https://web.archive.org/web/20130522051358/http://www.proxml.be/users/paul/weblog/55d41/Integrity_constraints_in_SKOS_part_2.html >>> >>> >>> https://web.archive.org/web/20130522044951/http://www.proxml.be/users/paul/weblog/bfa21/Integrity_Constraints_in_SKOS_part_3.html >>> >>> >>> https://web.archive.org/web/20130522033512/http://www.proxml.be/users/paul/weblog/0a621/SKOS_part_4_property_chains.html >>> >>> >>> >>> There is also some commentary on the topic on Holger Knublauch's blog >>> (obviously promoting SPIN): >>> >>> http://composing-the-semantic-web.blogspot.com/2010/04/where-owl-fails.html >>> >>> >>> >>> -Osma >>> >> > > -- Osma Suominen D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist National Library of Finland P.O. Box 26 (Kaikukatu 4) 00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO Tel. +358 50 3199529 osma.suominen@helsinki.fi http://www.nationallibrary.fi
Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2016 09:01:35 UTC