- From: Osma Suominen <osma.suominen@helsinki.fi>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 10:46:41 +0200
- To: public-esw-thes@w3.org
Hi Antoine! I just noticed this item in the TopBraid 5.1.0 release notes [1]: - Feature: Added SHACL library for SKOS constraints. So apparently SHACL rules for SKOS constraints have already been developed (by TopQuadrant I assume). Which is maybe not a big surprise, since they've had SPIN rules for SKOS for quite some time and SHACL is in some ways a successor of SPIN (with TopQuadrant represented in the SHACL WG) and SKOS ICs were also one of the initial use cases for SHACL [2]. -Osma [1] http://www.topquadrant.com/docs/versions/changes-5.1.txt [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl-ucr/#uc21-skos-constraints 18.01.2016, 09:32, Antoine Isaac kirjoitti: > Thanks a lot, Osma! > This is really good to have. > And in a way confirms the interest of wait-and-seeing until we can start > playing with SHACL / RDF Shapes (arguably closer to SPIN). > > To come back to Simon's comment. Yes OWL2 is good, but having an OWL1 > representation already allows to use SKOS in OWL2 context (i.e. it > specifies which classes and properties are in the SKOS vocabulary). What > we're missing then is a handful of contraints from the SKOS model, which > OWL2 may anyway not allow one to capture in the way most people would > need them (i.e. in a 'closed-world' manner). > > Best, > > Antoine > > On 1/18/16 8:18 AM, Osma Suominen wrote: >> On 17/01/16 12:29, Antoine Isaac wrote: >>> I'm actually a bit surprised I couldn't find a trace of an earlier >>> attempt... >> >> Are you perhaps referring to Paul Hermans' series of blog posts from >> 2010 where he attempted to express some of the SKOS ICs using OWL2 and >> SPIN? His conclusion at the time was that most of them couldn't be >> represented in OWL2. >> >> The blog is long gone now but the posts are still available thanks to >> the Internet Archive: >> >> https://web.archive.org/web/20130522054521/http://www.proxml.be/users/paul/weblog/aaad2/Integrity_constraints_in_SKOS_part_1_.html >> >> https://web.archive.org/web/20130522051358/http://www.proxml.be/users/paul/weblog/55d41/Integrity_constraints_in_SKOS_part_2.html >> >> https://web.archive.org/web/20130522044951/http://www.proxml.be/users/paul/weblog/bfa21/Integrity_Constraints_in_SKOS_part_3.html >> >> https://web.archive.org/web/20130522033512/http://www.proxml.be/users/paul/weblog/0a621/SKOS_part_4_property_chains.html >> >> >> There is also some commentary on the topic on Holger Knublauch's blog >> (obviously promoting SPIN): >> >> http://composing-the-semantic-web.blogspot.com/2010/04/where-owl-fails.html >> >> >> -Osma >> > -- Osma Suominen D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist National Library of Finland P.O. Box 26 (Kaikukatu 4) 00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO Tel. +358 50 3199529 osma.suominen@helsinki.fi http://www.nationallibrary.fi
Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2016 08:47:09 UTC