- From: Johan De Smedt <johan.de-smedt@tenforce.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 06:59:45 +0100
- To: <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com>, "'Stella Dextre Clarke'" <stella@lukehouse.org>, "'ZENG, MARCIA'" <mzeng@kent.edu>, "ISO25964 NISO list" <iso25964@list.niso.org>
- Cc: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>, <L.Will@willpowerinfo.co.uk>, "'Joan Cobb'" <JCobb@getty.edu>, <PHarpring@getty.edu>, "'Garcia, Gregg'" <GGarcia@getty.edu>
Hi Vladimir, The usage of unlabeled (i.e. anonymous) ThesaurusArray is perfect as per your example. If allowed I'ld love to take your example in future documentation of the iso-25964 documentation. [+1 for the plantUML :-) ] Notes on the current state of the iso-25964 schema and its documentation. Besides the documentation, the following are under discussion: - broaderInstantive and narrowerInstantive will be renamend to broaderInstantial and narrowerInstantial - Hierarchical transitivity for BTx/NTx is under discussion in order to extend the current model This will take into account the remarks given by Leonard, Jutta, Antoine and yourself. Kind Regards, Johan De Smedt > -----Original Message----- > From: Vladimir Alexiev [mailto:vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com] > Sent: Thursday, 21 November, 2013 16:36 > To: 'Stella Dextre Clarke'; 'ZENG, MARCIA' > Cc: public-esw-thes@w3.org; L.Will@willpowerinfo.co.uk; 'Joan Cobb'; PHarpring@getty.edu; 'Garcia, > Gregg' > Subject: RE: how to: ordered collection of a Concept > > > (although I did not find an attachment with the diagram you mentioned). > > Sorry Stella, I attach it now: > > complex-hierarchy.png. Notes: > 1. represent all of Getty's Facets, Hierarchies and Guide Terms as iso:ThesaurusArray. > 2. represent concepts as skos:Concept > 3. represent the hierarchical relations using different properties: > skos:Concept -skos:narrower-> skos:Concept > skos:Concept -iso:subordinateArray-> iso:ThesaurusArray > iso:ThesaurusArray -skos:member-> skos:Concept > iso:ThesaurusArray -skos:member-> iso:ThesaurusArray > 4. "shortcut" skos:narrower properties to "go through Arrays". > You can see an example: the relation > containers -skos:narrower-> vessels > spans 2 levels in the original AAT hierarchy. > > > > > My understanding is that the current schema provides all that is needed concerning the discussed > problems... > > Is my understanding that this provides sufficient tools for AAT correct? > > Johan, all of this is correct and described very well. > > But still nobody has answered whether the pattern "anonymous Array under Concept" is the best > answer to my question. > Here is an illustration: > - ordered-collection.png: shows a Guide Term and a Concept that have ordered children > - ordered-list.png: shows the additional rdf:List structure that captures the order > > Cheers! Vladimir
Received on Friday, 22 November 2013 06:00:18 UTC