- From: Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de>
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 23:26:14 +0100
- To: Bob DuCharme <bob@snee.com>
- CC: SKOS <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Hi, Doesn't answer your question, but: The DC terms namespace contains all the elements properties, so http://purl.org/dc/terms/title exists: http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-title Regards, Simon Bob DuCharme wrote: > Yesterday I was discussing with a colleague whether rdfs:label or > skos:prefLabel would be better, and today I noticed this at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-skos-reference-20090818/#L1045 : > > <S> rdf:type skos:ConceptScheme ; > dct:title "My First Thesaurus" ; > skos:hasTopConcept <B> . > > dct: is never declared anywhere. I'm guessing from the t that > http://purl.org/dc/terms/ was meant, but title is a property of > http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ , not of http://purl.org/dc/terms/ . > Either way, it's confusing and another example of why people should > always declare their prefixes, if only in a note at the beginning of a > spec that uses them in examples. > > But enough of my complaining. Has anyone seen a common practice using a > particular property to assign a human-readable label to a > skos:ConceptScheme? > > thanks, > > Bob >
Received on Friday, 11 March 2011 22:27:18 UTC