- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:10:39 +1000
- To: public-esw-thes@w3.org
- Message-Id: <12BAA862-7AAC-4C3E-B365-381E1763FB44@topquadrant.com>
What aspects of SPARQL would such a standard layer include? We and our customers are heavily using SPARQL in the context of SKOS, and we have published a SPARQL-based constraint checking library [1] using the W3C Member Submission SPIN [2]. This will validate the various SKOS-specific integrity constraints and has been integrated with TopQuadrant's Enterprise Vocabulary Net (EVN) solution [3]. SPIN also makes it easy to encapsulate reusable SPARQL queries into so-called templates. These templates are basically parameterized queries that have a URI and arguments. Compare to stored procedures in SQL. It would be straight-forward to build and publish such a template library for SKOS, if someone here has a list of queries that they like to ask repeatedly. Cheers, Holger [1] http://topbraid.org/spin/skosspin [2] http://spinrdf.org/ [3] http://www.topquadrant.com/solutions/ent_vocab_net.html On Jun 27, 2011, at 10:34 AM, <Simon.Cox@csiro.au> wrote: > “a "standard" layer encapsulating Sparql especially designed for SKOS based systems > might help in this situation. ” > > +1 > > From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org [mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Andreas Blumauer (Semantic Web Company) > Sent: Sunday, 26 June 2011 4:36 PM > To: public-esw-thes@w3.org > Subject: Results of survey "Do controlled vocabularies matter?" > > Hello all, > > we are happy to announce that the results of the survey titled > "Do controlled vocabularies matter?" are available now. > > A short write-up and also the link to the report can be found here: > http://blog.semantic-web.at/2011/06/26/thesaurus-based-search-engines-will-become-main-stream-in-the-near-future/ > > The report itself was published on issuu: > http://issuu.com/andreas_blumauer/docs/survey_do_controlled_vocabularies_matter_2011_june > > We would be happy to receive comments from the community on this. > > As an interesting outcome it can be stated, that people working on controlled vocabularies > seem to have put aside scepticism about the semantic web finally. > > On the other side the whole semantic web cake has not been digested yet: > E.g. only a few people from the vocab-community deal with Sparql, which brings me to the conclusion > that a "standard" layer encapsulating Sparql especially designed for SKOS based systems > might help in this situation. > > Any activities going on in this area? > > Best wishes, > Andreas > > ** Semantic Search Online Demo: http://bit.ly/semantic_search > ** LOD2 - Creating Knowledge out of Interlinked Data - http://lod2.eu/ > > | Andreas Blumauer, Managing Director > | Semantic Web Company GmbH > | Lerchenfelder Guertel 43/5 > | A - 1160 Wien, Austria > > | Tel +43 1 402 12 35 27 > | Mob +43 676 9 234 16 2 > > COMPANY INFORMATION > | http://www.semantic-web.at/ | http://www.i-semantics.at/ | http://blog.semantic-web.at/ > > PERSONAL INFORMATION > | mailto:a.blumauer@semantic-web.at | skype:blumauerpunkt | Blog:http://ablvienna.wordpress.com >
Received on Monday, 27 June 2011 01:11:29 UTC