- From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:14:25 -0500
- To: "Tillett, Barbara" <btil@loc.gov>
- Cc: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>, "LAABOUDI Christine (OP)" <Christine.LAABOUDI@publications.europa.eu>, "public-esw-thes@w3.org" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>, "Svensson, Lars" <l.svensson@d-nb.de>, "Dechman, Libby" <edec@loc.gov>, "McLean, Loche" <lmcl@loc.gov>
- Message-ID: <BANLkTikP9veoyNztsPXP5YbbHJB+knLHvQ@mail.gmail.com>
I agree with Barbara and have found Wordnik a useful "Same Context" tool for discovery (that also happens to come with a great API). http://www.wordnik.com/words/fishery#related Allowing a user to make leaps from domain specific, such as the RT (related terms) here on Eurovoc: http://eurovoc.europa.eu/drupal/?q=request&view=pt&termuri=http://eurovoc.europa.eu/216904&language=en To layman or consumer terms that might also help discovery (Same Context): http://www.wordnik.com/words/audit#related Different purposes but not always a different audience. Academics, Scientists, and Government also have basic common Thesaurus needs as well. 2 cents, On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Tillett, Barbara <btil@loc.gov> wrote: > We at the Library of Congress, Policy and Standards Division are working on > mapping/linking for the various language versions of LCSH (Library of > Congress Subject Headings) - so basically the same vocabulary - same > construct, same structure and basis and domain. We decided not to try to > "map" or link terminology across different thesauri, because they are so > often for different domains, different structures, and especially when for > different languages, the concepts are not the same - so fuzzy matching would > probably be as good as it would get. Do we really need that, when > co-occurrence of terms found in bibliographic records might give even better > results for users to explore? I'd like to see us use " if you liked this > term, you might try these terms in these thesauri" - not saying they are the > same but pointing out that others have found them to be related. I > personally prefer that approach. The maintenance on a mapping approach seems > to me to be a prohibitively expensive, long-term commitment that is not > sustainable, and not necessary. - Barbara Tillett**** > > ** ** > > Barbara B. Tillett, Ph.D.**** > > Chief, Policy & Standards Division**** > > Library of Congress**** > > 101 Independence Ave., SE**** > > Washington, D.C. 20540-4260**** > > U.S.A.**** > > tel: +1 (202) 707-4714**** > > fax: +1 (202) 707-6629**** > > email: btil@loc.gov**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Bernard Vatant [mailto:bernard.vatant@mondeca.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 21, 2011 9:26 AM > *To:* LAABOUDI Christine (OP) > *Cc:* public-esw-thes@w3.org; Tillett, Barbara; Svensson, Lars > > *Subject:* Re: Representation of Compound Mapping in SKOS**** > > ** ** > > Dear Christine > > > The SKOS core is now a W3C recommendation and is a stable document that > will not be changed. > That said, extension for compound (cordinated) concepts is clearly needed > and could someday be put either on the W3C track, either taken in charge > somehow by the librarian community. > Beyond SKOS users on this forum, I cc to Barbara Tillett at LoC, with whom > I remember exchanging a few words at IFLA 2010 about it, and Lars Svensson > at D-NB. > Seems to me there are coordinated concepts in the D-NB linked data > publication (Lars correct me if I am wrong) but I could not figure out the > ontology used. > > Best > > Bernard > > **** > > 2011/6/21 LAABOUDI Christine (OP) < > Christine.LAABOUDI@publications.europa.eu>**** > > Dear all, > > In the framework of our Thesaurus Alignment project and on the behalf of > the members of the Thesaurus Working Group, we would like to suggest the > addition of a new “compound mapping” property in the SKOS-Core. > > Examples of mapping between EUR-LEX directory Code (T1) and EuroVoc (T2) > > A] Intersective Mapping > > T1 04.10.40 Fisheries / Common fisheries policy / State aids > ExactMatch > T2 (common fishery policy AND state aids) > > B] Cumulative Mapping > > T1 03.06.53 Eggs and poultry ExactMatch T2 (poultry OR egg) > > Best regards, > > > Christine LAABOUDI-SPOIDEN > Publications Office > EUR-Lex - Eurovoc Team > MER 127 > Tel: +352 2929 42858 > > > > > **** > > > > > -- > Bernard Vatant > Senior Consultant > Vocabulary & Data Integration > Tel: +33 (0) 971 488 459 > Mail: bernard.vatant@mondeca.com > ---------------------------------------------------- > Mondeca > 3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France > Web: http://www.mondeca.com > Blog: http://mondeca.wordpress.com > ----------------------------------------------------**** > -- -Thad http://www.freebase.com/view/en/thad_guidry
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2011 19:15:06 UTC