- From: Leonard Will <L.Will@willpowerinfo.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:19:19 +0000
- To: public-esw-thes@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4D358547.2000704@willpowerinfo.co.uk>
From: Christophe Dupriez <christophe.dupriez@destin.be> >>> Does anyone have designed a way to specify concept ordering when >>> displaying a tree of concepts? On 2011-01-14 16:32, Joseph Tennis wrote: > This is what expressive notation in classification was for. This was addressed in the data model for British Standard Draft for Development DD8723-5:2008, which is available at <http://schemas.bs8723.org/Model/Model.jpg>. This provided for concepts and arrays to have a notation that could be used to order them within an array. An array could also have a Boolean flag to indicate whether it was ordered or not, i.e. whether the order in which the entries were presented was significant. The model has been refined for the forthcoming standard ISO25964 and I attach a copy of the current draft, which may be helpful for future developments. This also distinguishes between "Arrays" and "ConceptGroups", the latter including subsets such as subject groupings and microthesauri, which may be selected and ordered on a different basis, independent of the hierarchical relationships between concepts. As I understand it, at present SKOS does not make this distinction but has to use what it calls "collections" to represent both these elements, making it difficult to deal with them properly. Leonard Will -- Willpower Information (Partners: Dr Leonard D Will, Sheena E Will) Information Management Consultants Tel: +44 (0)20 8372 0092 27 Calshot Way L.Will@Willpowerinfo.co.uk ENFIELD Sheena.Will@Willpowerinfo.co.uk EN2 7BQ, UK http://www.willpowerinfo.co.uk/
Attachments
- image/jpeg attachment: Model_2009-08-31.jpg
Received on Tuesday, 18 January 2011 12:23:16 UTC