- From: Neubert Joachim <J.Neubert@zbw.eu>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:40:48 +0100
- To: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Leonard, > The ISO 25964 model (which you can see attached to my message at > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2008Dec/0003.html>) > has an explicit relationship between any note and any concept > referred to within that note. This is intended to cover the That's really good news! It indeed covers the situation in a general way. The SKOS model allows, as Antoine pointed out, even more (indeed arbitrarily complex) structures for notes, but in my eyes these structures require some self-discipline and some explanation (in form of documentation properties or comments, which can be attached to custom sub-properties of skos:note oder skos:scopeNote). > and "restrictions on market entry". My suggestion was that a > user would be referred to the preferred term "market entry" > by the entries: > > restrictive business practices > SN: For restrictions on market entry USE market entry > RT: market entry In my opinion, this will work fine both with the ISO data model (Note refersTo ThesaurusConcept) and with a structured form of skos:note or skos:scopeNote (with or without a RT/skos:related). > and > > restrictions on market entry > USE: market entry > SKOS does not provide "non-descriptors" as stand-alone entries, so this kind of hint could only be attached to <market entry> as an altLabel. (May be a good addition, but doesn't help at <restrictive business practices>.) > text? If a structure is needed I would prefer to make it > another formal type of relationship, not a note, but I'd > rather not introduce this complication. For my part I like the idea of having the structure and meaning of "use-instead" explicitly defined - but I agree, it's another thing to introduce an extension of the ISO data model for this special case. (And, by the way, there are forms of "use-instead" notes which cannot be formalized at all - e.g. <industrial promotion> - For the promotion of particular sectors or regions USE the corresponding descriptors). Kind regards, Joachim
Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2009 14:30:33 UTC