- From: Howard Burrows <hburrows@supportingresearch.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:31:54 -0400
- To: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Alistair Miles'" <alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
Received on Friday, 31 October 2008 14:54:56 UTC
All, I wonder, would it be better to call SKOS SCOS, a "simple concept organization scheme"? Sorry if this is late and totally inappropriate, but perhaps the use of the word "knowledge" in SKOS should be discussed (again?). Not that the current choice is a bad thing, but I expected, and would really like to see, another sort of SKOS with a different set of requirements. My work involves developing an organization system for distinguishing what is "thought" from what is "known". You can't be said to "know" anything unless it is an assertion that has the right sort of entitling warrant. There would be other requirements in the common "justified, true, belief" notion of knowledge. Since SKOS doesn't seem to address either of these, it might be worth changing the name, or at least commenting somewhere in the documentation that there could be a family of SKOS recommendations in the future. You have an important and well-established community that is quite comfortable with the terms as you are using them. However, I think I would prefer to separate schemes for epistemology from those for ontology. Howard Burrows, PhD Supporting Research Durham, NH, USA
Received on Friday, 31 October 2008 14:54:56 UTC