- From: Mark van Assem <mark@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:01:07 +0200
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- CC: "Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, public-esw-thes@w3.org, SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
> I would even prefer the > sloppiness introduced by the range underspecification in Guus' second > (or third? ;-) proposal [3] +1 * the SKOS spec already has this "sloppiness" because it allows both literals and nodes (blank and non-blank) in the range of skos:note [1,2] * less interpretative steps needed to distinguish the cases. Mark. [1]http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-skos-core-guide/#secdoclitstyle [2]http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-skos-core-guide/#secdocnodestyle > Cheers, > > Antoine > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Mar/0092.html > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Mar/0099.html > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Mar/0004.html > >> >> If only the Pattern for N-ary relations [1] had already provided a >> class for Relation it would have been great to use that. >> >> Cheers, >> Mark. >> >> [1]http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/ >> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Alistair. >>> >>> [1] >>> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Mar/0092.html> >>> >>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Mark. >>>> >>>>> The first example I gave (animals/fauna) was meant to illustrate how >>>> >>> a >>> >>>>> "terms-as-classes" representation can be defined as an extension of >>>> >>> my >>> >>>>> proposal [1]. >>>>> >>>>> The second example I gave (Corporation/Corp. - which you quote >>>> >>> below) >>> >>>>> was meant to illustrate how an "n-ary relations" representation can >>>> >>> be >>> >>>>> defined an extension of my proposal [1]. I.e. the second example had >>>>> nothing to do with "terms-as-classes". >>>>> >>>>> Does that clarify? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> Alistair. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Mark van Assem [mailto:mark@cs.vu.nl] >>>>>> Sent: 20 March 2007 12:07 >>>>>> To: Miles, AJ (Alistair); public-esw-thes@w3.org >>>>>> Subject: Re: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: >>>>>> RelationshipBetweenLabels >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Alistair, >>>>>> >>>>>> Why is terms-as-classes an extension of [1]? The whole idea of >>>>>> terms-as-classes is that properties can be made between the >>>>>> term-classes (i.e. between two URIs), while [1] assigns no >>>>>> URI to them >>>>>> but simply repeats the literal. If the range of >>>>>> abbreviatedForm were a >>>>>> resource (URI) instead of a literal, then I would agree that they >>>>> >>> are >>> >>>>>> equivalent (but still not an extension). >>>>>> >>>>>> ex:A a skos:Concept; >>>>>> skos:prefLabel "Corporation"@en; >>>>>> skos:altLabel "Corp."@en; >>>>>> skos:annotation [ >>>>>> a ex:AbbreviationRelation; >>>>>> ex:abbreviatedForm "Corp."@en; >>>>>> ex:fullForm "Corporation"@en; >>>>>> ]. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Mark. >>>>>> >>>>>> [1]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd- >>>>> >>>> wg/2007Mar/0092.html >>>> >>>>>> Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> As a point of interest, note that a representation following the >>>>>>> "terms-as-classes" pattern can actually be defined as an >>>>>> >>>>>> *extension* of >>>>>> >>>>>>> my proposal at [1]. Guus' proposal [3] (which follows the "n-ary >>>>>>> relations" pattern) can *also* be derived as an extension of [1]. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This demonstrates that it is not a simple "either-or" >>>>>> >>>>>> choice between the >>>>>> >>>>>>> "terms-as-classes" and "n-ary relations" patterns described at >>>>>> >>> [2]. >>> >>>>>>> There is a solution [1] from which both approaches may be derived >>>>>> >>> as >>> >>>>>>> extensions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Example "terms-as-classes" extension ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- Begin Turtle --- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> @prefix ex: <http://www.example.com/example#>. >>>>>>> # skos: rdfs: rdf: xsd: conventional namespace prefixes >>>>>>> >>>>>>> # Define the extension >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ex:ThesaurusTerm rdfs:subClassOf skos:Annotation. >>>>>>> ex:preferredTerm rdfs:subPropertyOf skos:annotation; >>>>>>> rdfs:range ex:ThesaurusTerm. >>>>>>> ex:nonPreferredTerm rdfs:subPropertyOf skos:annotation; >>>>>>> rdfs:range ex:ThesaurusTerm. >>>>>>> ex:literalValue rdfs:subPropertyOf skos:annotatesLiteral; >>>>>>> rdfs:domain ex:ThesaurusTerm. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> # Apply extended vocabulary >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ex:A a skos:Concept; >>>>>>> skos:prefLabel "animals"@en; >>>>>>> skos:altLabel "fauna"@en; >>>>>>> ex:preferredTerm [ >>>>>>> a ex:ThesaurusTerm; >>>>>>> ex:literalValue "animals"@en; >>>>>>> ]; >>>>>>> ex:nonPreferredTerm [ >>>>>>> a ex:ThesaurusTerm; >>>>>>> ex:literalValue "fauna"@en; >>>>>>> ]. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- End Turtle --- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Example "n-ary relations" extension ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- Begin Turtle --- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> @prefix ex: <http://www.example.com/example#>. >>>>>>> # skos: rdfs: rdf: conventional namespace prefixes >>>>>>> >>>>>>> # Define the extension >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ex:LabelRelation rdfs:subClassOf skos:Annotation. >>>>>>> ex:AbbreviationRelation rdfs:subClassOf ex:LabelRelation. >>>>>>> ex:labelRelationSubject rdfs:subPropertyOf skos:annotatesLiteral; >>>>>>> rdfs:domain ex:LabelRelation. >>>>>>> ex:labelRelationObject rdfs:subPropertyOf skos:annotatesLiteral; >>>>>>> rdfs:domain ex:LabelRelation. >>>>>>> ex:hasLabelRelation rdfs:subPropertyOf skos:annotation; >>>>>>> rdfs:range ex:LabelRelation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> # Apply extended vocabulary >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ex:B a skos:Concept; >>>>>>> skos:prefLabel "Corporation"@en; >>>>>>> skos:altLabel "Corp."@en; >>>>>>> ex:hasLabelRelation [ >>>>>>> a ex:AbbreviationRelation; >>>>>>> ex:labelRelationSubject "Corporation"@en; >>>>>>> ex:labelRelationObject "Corp."@en; >>>>>>> ]. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- End Turtle --- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Finally, note that the proposal [1] is also a solution to >>>>>> >>>>>> the issue of >>>>>> >>>>>>> annotations on labels. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Alistair. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [1] >>>>>> >>>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Mar/0092.html >>>>>> >>>>>>> [2] >>>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/RelationshipsBet >>>>>> weenLabels >>>>>> >>>>>>> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Feb/0181 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> From: public-swd-wg-request@w3.org >>>>>>>> [mailto:public-swd-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Miles, AJ >>>>>>>> (Alistair) >>>>>>>> Sent: 19 March 2007 17:42 >>>>>>>> To: Guus Schreiber; SWD WG >>>>>>>> Cc: public-esw-thes@w3.org >>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: >>>>>>>> RelationshipBetweenLabels >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would like to offer an alternative proposal. This proposal >>>>>>>> is similar >>>>>>>> to Guus' original proposal [1] with the modification given in >>>>>>> >>> [2]. >>> >>>>>>>> However, it it slightly more flexible, making less commitment >>>>>>> >>> than >>> >>>>>>>> [1]+[2]. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Vocabulary >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> skos:Annotation skos:annotation skos:annotatesLiteral >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Axiomatic Triples >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> skos:annotation rdfs:range skos:Annotation. >>>>>>>> skos:annotatesLiteral rdfs:domain skos:Annotation. >>>>>>>> skos:annotatesLiteral rdfs:range rdfs:Literal. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Additional Semantic Conditions: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> None. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Consistent Examples: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --- Begin Turtle --- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> @prefix ex: <http://www.example.com/example#>. >>>>>>>> # skos: rdfs: rdf: conventional namespace prefixes >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> # first extend proposed vocabulary >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ex:AbbreviationRelation rdfs:subClassOf skos:Annotation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ex:abbreviatedForm rdfs:subPropertyOf skos:annotatesLiteral; >>>>>>>> rdfs:domain ex:AbbreviationRelation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ex:fullForm rdfs:subPropertyOf skos:annotatesLiteral; >>>>>>>> rdfs:domain ex:AbbreviationRelation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> # now apply extended vocab >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ex:A a skos:Concept; >>>>>>>> skos:prefLabel "Corporation"@en; >>>>>>>> skos:altLabel "Corp."@en; >>>>>>>> skos:annotation [ >>>>>>>> a ex:AbbreviationRelation; >>>>>>>> ex:abbreviatedForm "Corp."@en; >>>>>>>> ex:fullForm "Corporation"@en; >>>>>>>> ]. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --- End Turtle --- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Inconsistent Examples: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> None possible. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Entailment Rules >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> None. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Justification >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This proposal provides a general, extendable, framework >>>>>>> >>>>>> for asserting >>>>>> >>>>>>>> n-ary relationsips between zero or more literals and zero or more >>>>>>>> concepts. The commitment is minimal, whilst still >>>>>>> >>>>>> retaining consistent >>>>>> >>>>>>>> expectations with respect to the domains and ranges of properties >>>>>>>> involved. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Alistair. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>> >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Feb/0181 >>> >>>>>>>> [2] >>>>>>>> >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Feb/0195.html >>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Alistair Miles >>>>>>>> Research Associate >>>>>>>> CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory >>>>>>>> Building R1 Room 1.60 >>>>>>>> Fermi Avenue >>>>>>>> Chilton >>>>>>>> Didcot >>>>>>>> Oxfordshire OX11 0QX >>>>>>>> United Kingdom >>>>>>>> Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman >>>>>>>> Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk >>>>>>>> Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>> From: public-swd-wg-request@w3.org >>>>>>>>> [mailto:public-swd-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Guus >>>>>>>> >>> Schreiber >>> >>>>>>>>> Sent: 27 February 2007 11:43 >>>>>>>>> To: SWD WG >>>>>>>>> Subject: [SKOS] Proposed Resolution for ISSUE 26: >>>>>>>>> RelationshipBetweenLabels >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ISSUE-26 [1] >>>>>>>>> RelationshipsBetweenLabels >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Considering that: >>>>>>>>> - representing lexical labels as classes would >>>>>>>>> lead to an undesirable complication of SKOS in >>>>>>>>> straightforward use cases for the application of SKOS, >>>>>>>>> - representing relationships between labels is >>>>>>>>> required in some use cases, and therefore an >>>>>>>>> escape mechanism should preferably be available >>>>>>>>> for such thesauri, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I propose the WG opts for an amended version of >>>>>>>>> the second solution proposed in [2]: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> RESOLUTION >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The WG resolves to add the following classes and >>>>>>>>> properties to the SKOS specification [3]: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - the class skos:LabelRelation >>>>>>>>> - the properties skos:labelRelationSubject and >>>>>>>>> skos:labelRelationObject with domain LabelRelation >>>>>>>>> and range rdfs:literal >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In addition, the SKOS Guide should describe >>>>>>>>> guidelines for SKOS users to define their label >>>>>>>>> relations as specializations of LabelRelation and >>>>>>>>> gives examples of its intended usage. The SKOS >>>>>>>>> specification refrains for now to predefine >>>>>>>>> specializations of LabelRelation. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Contrary to the proposal in [2] the class >>>>>>>>> LabelRelation is not defined as a subclass of >>>>>>>>> skos:Annotation (which is in any case not yet part >>>>>>>>> of the spec), as it is not an "annotation", but a >>>>>>>>> lexical relationship. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/26 >>>>>>>>> [2] >>>>>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/RelationshipsBet >>>>>>>>> weenLabels >>>>>>>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-skos-core-spec/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Computer Science >>>>>>>>> De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands >>>>>>>>> T: +31 20 598 7739/7718; F: +31 84 712 1446 >>>>>>>>> Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Alistair Miles >>>>>>> Research Associate >>>>>>> CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory >>>>>>> Building R1 Room 1.60 >>>>>>> Fermi Avenue >>>>>>> Chilton >>>>>>> Didcot >>>>>>> Oxfordshire OX11 0QX >>>>>>> United Kingdom >>>>>>> Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman >>>>>>> Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk >>>>>>> Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440 >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Mark F.J. van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam >>>>>> markREMOVE@cs.vu.nl - http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark >>>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Mark F.J. van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam >>>> markREMOVE@cs.vu.nl - http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Alistair Miles >>> Research Associate >>> CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory >>> Building R1 Room 1.60 >>> Fermi Avenue >>> Chilton >>> Didcot >>> Oxfordshire OX11 0QX >>> United Kingdom >>> Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman >>> Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk >>> Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440 >>> >> > > >
Received on Friday, 30 March 2007 12:01:13 UTC