- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:26:48 +0100
- To: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, SKOS <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Dear all, Following last week's teleconference [1], and, especially, the insightful comments got from the SKOS mailing lists [2] (thanks again to all of you who contributed to this important discussion!), I have revised my proposal for ISSUE-39 conceptualMappingLinks [3]. The result is accessible at [4] The main differences with the previous version [5] are: - skos:overlappingMatch is not kept. - there is a formal proposal for postponing resolution on: part of RDFS and OWL semantics, semantic conditions, inconsistent examples, entailment rules and syntactic constraints. I asked for feedback last week, and so far there has been only one comment on the axioms of [5]. I guess none of us has the time for this between now and the end of the year :-( - there is a formal proposal to raise an issue on mapping between conceptual entities (e.g. groupings) that are not of type skos:Concept - the discussion section has been revised: it now especially includes a paragraph on owl:sameAs vs skos:exactMatch and a paragraph on allowing mapping statements withing one concept scheme Best, Antoine [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/12/04-swd-minutes.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2007Nov/0013.html, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2007Dec/0010.html, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2007Dec/0000.html [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/39 [4] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/ConceptualMapping/ProposalTwo?action=recall&rev=4 [5] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/ConceptualMapping/ProposalTwo?action=recall&rev=3
Received on Monday, 10 December 2007 18:26:55 UTC