- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:11:36 +0100
- CC: public-esw-thes@w3.org, public-swd-wg@w3.org
Dear all, After a long period of silence, I have attached a new proposal [1] for a mapping vocabulary for SKOS to the page dedicated to ISSUE-39 [2] A bit of history. Some months ago, I proposed a first solution, trying to re-use the standard SKOS semantic relations (broader, narrower, related) to map concepts from different schemes [3]. This first proposal, submitted to the SKOS community list, was rejected (see discussion [4]). The new proposal hence follows an opposite approach. It is indeed more conservative, trying to consolidate the existing SKOS mapping vocabulary [5]. It therefore does not mix with the standard SKOS intra-scheme relations vocabulary. It also still delegates a lot of problems to other issues (like concept coordination [6]). But I hope it will be easier to make a decision that way. Comments are highly welcome! (I would like hereby to thank the SKOS community for all the relevant points that were made last time) Cheers, Antoine [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/ConceptualMapping/ProposalTwo [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/ConceptualMapping/ [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/ConceptualMapping/ProposalOne [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-esw-thes/2007Jul/0009.html [5] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/mapping/spec/ [6] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/40
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2007 22:11:48 UTC