- From: <tiago.murakami@itau.com.br>
- Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 14:36:31 -0300
- To: "Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Cc: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>, public-esw-thes@w3.org
Hi All,
There is a problem: Folksonomies are not a Controlled Vocabulary.
Tiago
"Miles, AJ
\(Alistair\)" To: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>
<A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk cc: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>, <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
> Subject: RE: [PORT] new editor's working draft of SKOS Core
Sent by: Vocab Spec
public-esw-thes-req
uest@w3.org
06/10/2005 14:25
Hey Dan,
>
> The negotiation is by language prefs from the browser,
> not (to be pedantic) by country, right? So a Dutch speaker
> in France can get Dutch, if they configure things properly.
Yep, depends on the 'Accept-Language:' header sent by the browser.
> One tiny edit. Instead of...
>
> "SKOS Core is a model for expressing the structure and content of
> concept schemes (thesauri, classification schemes, subject heading
> lists, taxonomies, terminologies, glossaries and other types of
> controlled vocabulary)."
>
> How about
>
> "SKOS Core is a model for expressing the structure and content of
> concept schemes (thesauri, classification schemes, subject heading
> lists, taxonomies, 'folksonomies', terminologies, glossaries
> and other
> types of controlled vocabulary)."
>
> If "folksonomy" proves to become a dated buzzword, we can
> remove it in a
> later version. Would be good for W3C to go on record as
> asserting SKOS's
> relevant there, though. In the Guide too, and other
> occurances of this
> abstract.
I'm happy to add this.
Cheers,
Al.
Esta mensagem e uma correspondencia reservada. Se voce a recebeu por engano, por favor desconsidere-a.
O sistema de mensagens da Internet nao e considerado seguro ou livre de erros. Esta instituicao nao se
responsabiliza por opinioes ou declaracoes veiculadas atraves de e-mails.
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2005 17:36:51 UTC