- From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:13:05 +0100
- To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair) " <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Cc: "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
The RDF resource of type foaf:Person is already a concept or at least an abstract thing, it's not the real Al. So you have a concept denoting an abstract thing. Sorry but I don't follow this. This is, no doubt, due to my lack of sufficient grounding in philosophy but I think you'll need more explaination if us poor technical types are supposed to be able to grok it. Dave Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote: > To help clear things up ... > > This property (whatever we end up calling it) is intended to be a bridge > between thesaurus style descriptions of things and ontology style > descriptions of things. Others (Danbri help me out here) will be able to > give better examples than me, but here is one example: > > my:conceptA a skos:Concept; > skos:prefLabel 'Alistair Miles'; > skos:denotes [ a foaf:Person; > foaf:mbox > <mailto:a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk> ]. > > It has also been suggested to have further properties like > 'skos:denotesClass' and 'skos:denotesIndividual' ... what do folks think > about that? > > On the subject of whether 'denotes' is the right name for this property ... > the Cambridge Advanced Learners Dictionary [1] has 'denotes' df. 'to > represent something.' The third definition from dictionary.com [2] has > 'denotes' df. 'To signify directly; refer to specifically.' > > So in these senses, I think we have 'skos:denotes' the right way round, > although I agree it doesn't seem quite perfect. All suggestions welcomed. > > Al. > > [1] http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=20729&dict=CALD > [2] http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=denotes > > --- > Alistair Miles > Research Associate > CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory > Building R1 Room 1.60 > Fermi Avenue > Chilton > Didcot > Oxfordshire OX11 0QX > United Kingdom > Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk > Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440 > > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org >>[mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Kal Ahmed >>Sent: 29 September 2004 15:21 >>To: Miles, AJ (Alistair) >>Cc: 'public-esw-thes@w3.org' >>Subject: Re: [Proposal][SKOS-Core] skos:denotes >> >> >> >>Hi Al, >> >>Either I misunderstand the definition or else I think your >>property name >>should be skos:denoted-by as it is the resource that denotes the >>concept....hmmm...I just checked >>http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=denotes and I am >>assuming you >>are using "denotes" in the sense of definition (3). Is that right ? >> >>Cheers, >> >>Kal >> >>Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote: >> >> >>>Hi all, >>> >>>This is a proposal for a new property for SKOS Core: >>> >>>skos:denotes a rdf:Property; >>> a owl:FunctionalProperty; >>> rdfs:domain skos:Concept; >>> rdfs:range rdf:Resource; >>> vm:term_status 'unstable'; >>> skos:definition 'The real world >> >>thing that >> >>>this concept is an abstraction of.' >>> >>>Comments on this (and especially the definition) most welcome. >>> >>>Al. >>> >>>--- >>>Alistair Miles >>>Research Associate >>>CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory >>>Building R1 Room 1.60 >>>Fermi Avenue >>>Chilton >>>Didcot >>>Oxfordshire OX11 0QX >>>United Kingdom >>>Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk >>>Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440 >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2004 15:13:14 UTC