- From: Cayzer, Steve <Steve.Cayzer@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:57:03 -0000
- To: "'Miles, AJ (Alistair) '" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Doesn't that break an open world assumption? Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: Miles, AJ (Alistair) [mailto:A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk] > Sent: 10 November 2003 13:34 > To: 'public-esw-thes@w3.org' > Subject: Design Issue (3) - How to label concepts? Dropping > soks:altLabel > > > > Hi Dave, > > I'm quite happy to ditch 'soks:altLabel' and assume all > 'rdfs:label's that are not 'soks:prefLabel' are alternatives. > This is definitely more economical. > > Al. > > > My suggestion implicitly had "altLabel" as a label which is not a > > perfLabel. This might have some advantages when it comes to > > merging. If you > > have two thesauri with differing perferred terms for the same > > concept the > > merge would just have two prefLabels and all else (not > > preferred in either) > > would be treated as alt. Don't know enough about how thesauri > > are used in > > practice to know if that is beter or worse. > > >
Received on Monday, 10 November 2003 09:00:01 UTC